HFrEF: Four Pillars, Rapid Titration and Follow-Up
A talk for cardiologists and GPs: the four drug classes, rapid dose titration and follow-up after discharge.
- Audience: Fellow doctors
- 11 slides
- 14 sources
- Design: Ocean
The topic the presentation was made from
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the four pillars of therapy, rapid dose titration and outpatient follow-up
Doctoria puts this topic into the creation wizard — adapt it to your needs.
Slide 1 · HFrEF: Four Pillars, Rapid Titration, Close Follow-Up
Speaker notes
Good morning, everyone. Today we focus on one of the most actionable areas in cardiology: reduced ejection fraction heart failure. We know what works. Four drug classes together change prognosis. Our weak point is implementation. Patients leave hospital on low doses, or missing whole classes, and titration stalls for months. We will cover three things. First, the evidence for quadruple therapy and the doses we aim for. Second, how fast we can safely titrate, using STRONG-HF as our model. Third, how to organise outpatient follow-up and when to refer. My goal is that you leave with a concrete plan for your next patient.
Slide 2 · Quadruple therapy: largest mortality benefit in HFrEF
Speaker notes
Let's start with the size of the prize. The 2025 network meta-analysis in JACC pooled 89 randomised trials and more than one hundred thousand patients. Quadruple therapy with an ARNI, a beta-blocker, an MRA and an SGLT2 inhibitor reduced all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of about 0.39 versus placebo. Adding vericiguat moved it slightly further, to 0.35. In absolute terms, a typical 70-year-old gains over five life-years. A separate meta-analysis shows the same combination produces the largest reverse remodelling, with LVEF gains around 15 points. Practical point: when you tell a patient this is worth five extra years, adherence conversations become much easier.
Slide 3 · The four pillars: starting and target doses
Speaker notes
Here are the four pillars with trial-proven doses, aligned with the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline and the 2024 ACC decision pathway. ARNI is preferred over ACE inhibitor or ARB in symptomatic patients; if switching from an ACE inhibitor, respect the 36-hour washout. Only the three evidence-based beta-blockers belong here. MRA dosing depends on potassium and renal function. And the SGLT2 inhibitor is the easiest pillar: one dose, no titration, minimal blood pressure effect. Practical tip: the target dose is the trial dose, not a suggestion. Document the current percentage of target for each class at every visit, so the gap stays visible.
Slide 4 · Start all four pillars early, not sequentially
Speaker notes
The old teaching was to introduce drugs one by one, pushing each to target before adding the next. That historical order reflects when trials were published, not biology. The benefits of each class appear within weeks, so delaying a class means losing benefit. The 2024 ACC decision pathway endorses rapid, flexible sequencing: get all four classes on board at low doses, then titrate. A useful order in a borderline-pressure patient is SGLT2 inhibitor and MRA first, since they barely lower blood pressure, then beta-blocker and ARNI. Hospital admission is the ideal moment: the patient is monitored and motivated.
Slide 5 · Rapid titration: lessons from STRONG-HF
Speaker notes
So we know what to give. The next question is how fast. For years we lacked randomised data on the pace of titration, and many of us were cautious, especially in older or frail patients. STRONG-HF changed that. It tested an intensive strategy right after an acute heart failure admission, the highest-risk window, and measured both efficacy and safety. Let's look at what it showed and how it translates to your clinic.
Slide 6 · STRONG-HF: full doses within two weeks
Speaker notes
STRONG-HF randomised over a thousand patients just before discharge. The high-intensity arm aimed for full doses within two weeks, with visits checking congestion, blood pressure, heart rate, potassium, creatinine and NT-proBNP. The primary endpoint of death or heart failure readmission at 180 days fell from about 23 to 15 percent. Subanalyses are reassuring: no meaningful interaction with age over 65, sex, baseline kidney function, or ejection fraction above or below 40 percent, and quality of life improved more with intensive care. Adverse events were somewhat more frequent but serious events were not. Take-home: the elderly patient is not a reason to go slow by default.
Slide 7 · Rapid up-titration applies to all patients
Speaker notes
This sentence from the STRONG-HF sex-specific analysis captures the message well. Women are historically undertreated and underdosed in heart failure, often because of concerns about lower body weight or blood pressure. In STRONG-HF, women and men had similar benefit and similar safety. The same was true for older patients. So the default should be to titrate everyone, and to individualise only when there is a specific clinical reason. Let's now look at those reasons, the common barriers that stall titration, and how to handle them without abandoning therapy.
Slide 8 · Managing common titration barriers
Speaker notes
These are the barriers that most often stop titration. Asymptomatic low blood pressure is not a contraindication; many patients run systolic pressures in the nineties without problems. If symptomatic, cut the diuretic in a euvolaemic patient and stop non-heart-failure antihypertensives before touching GDMT. The KDIGO conference emphasised that small eGFR declines after starting these drugs are usually haemodynamic and do not require discontinuation. In STRONG-HF, an early eGFR drop was linked to residual congestion and subsequently lower GDMT doses, so think decongestion, not withdrawal. Note also that SGLT2 inhibitors protect against renal adverse events and help limit hyperkalaemia.
Slide 9 · Structured follow-up and timely specialist referral
Speaker notes
How do we make this work in practice? Borrow the STRONG-HF structure: early visits after discharge, roughly weekly or fortnightly, each with a short checklist. Assess congestion, vital signs, potassium, creatinine and natriuretic peptide, then make one change. Nurse-led or telephone visits can cover many steps. Refer early when titration stalls because of intolerance, when symptoms persist, or after repeated admissions. And remember device timing: reassess LVEF after about three months of optimised therapy, since many patients improve enough to avoid an ICD. Practical tip: a pre-printed titration plan given at discharge saves weeks.
Slide 10 · References
Slide 11 · Questions?
Speaker notes
To summarise: quadruple therapy offers the largest survival benefit we have in HFrEF, measured in years of life. Start all four classes early and in parallel, ideally before discharge. Titrate rapidly, as STRONG-HF showed, across ages and sexes, with structured visits checking congestion, vitals and labs. Manage hypotension, kidney function changes and potassium thoughtfully rather than stopping drugs. And refer when titration stalls or advanced features appear. I'm happy to take questions or discuss difficult cases from your practice.
References
- van Essen BJ, Ceelen DCH, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Pharmacologic Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.054
- Tang J, Wang P, Liu C, et al. Pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000003118
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
- Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024
- Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1
- Arrigo M, Biegus J, Asakage A, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure in elderly patients: A sub-analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2920
- Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Lam CSP, Sliwa K, et al. Sex-specific analysis of the rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after a hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2882
- Ter Maaten JM, Mebazaa A, Davison B, et al. Early changes in renal function during rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy following an admission for acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3074
- Čelutkienė J, Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Cotter G, et al. Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2024. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221
- Arrigo M, Davison B, Edwards C, et al. Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of early vs. late enrollees of the STRONG-HF trial. Am Heart J. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.019
- Lam CSP, Bozkurt B, Cherney DZI, et al. Kidney Disease and Heart Failure: Recent Advances and Current Challenges: Conclusions From a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. JACC Heart Fail. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.102943
- Jiang N, Zhang Y, Tang Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of different SGLT2 inhibitor-based combination strategies in HFrEF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1742128
- Writing Committee, Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022
This presentation was generated automatically to show what Doctoria can do and has not been reviewed as clinical guidance. Clinical cases in the examples are fictional.
More examples
Hypertension 2024–2025: ESC and AHA/ACC Guideline Updates
A conference talk for colleagues: new blood pressure targets, initial combination therapy and the drug classes the latest guidelines added.
Fellow doctors · 11 slides · 11 sources
Modern Type 2 Diabetes Therapy: Choosing Drugs by Organ Risk
A lecture for medical students and residents: choosing glucose-lowering therapy by cardiovascular and kidney risk.
Students & residents · 11 slides · 14 sources
CAP in a 67-Year-Old with COPD: Case Review
A fictional case review: from presenting complaints and work-up to CURB-65 severity, antibiotic choice and take-home points.
Fellow doctors · 11 slides · 9 sources