HFrEF: Four Pillars, Rapid Titration and Follow-Up

A talk for cardiologists and GPs: the four drug classes, rapid dose titration and follow-up after discharge.

The topic the presentation was made from

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the four pillars of therapy, rapid dose titration and outpatient follow-up

Create a similar one

Doctoria puts this topic into the creation wizard — adapt it to your needs.

  1. Slide 1 · HFrEF: Four Pillars, Rapid Titration, Close Follow-Up

    HFrEF: Four Pillars, Rapid Titration, Close Follow-Up
    From guideline evidence to a practical outpatient titration strategy
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    Good morning, everyone. Today we focus on one of the most actionable areas in cardiology: reduced ejection fraction heart failure. We know what works. Four drug classes together change prognosis. Our weak point is implementation. Patients leave hospital on low doses, or missing whole classes, and titration stalls for months. We will cover three things. First, the evidence for quadruple therapy and the doses we aim for. Second, how fast we can safely titrate, using STRONG-HF as our model. Third, how to organise outpatient follow-up and when to refer. My goal is that you leave with a concrete plan for your next patient.

  2. Slide 2 · Quadruple therapy: largest mortality benefit in HFrEF

    Quadruple therapy: largest mortality benefit in HFrEF
    HR 0.39
    All-cause mortality, ARNI+BB+MRA+SGLT2i vs placebo (network meta-analysis)
    5.3 years
    Additional life-years for a representative 70-year-old vs no treatment
    +15.6%
    LVEF improvement with ARNI+BB+MRA+SGLT2i vs placebo
    89 RCTs
    103,754 patients in the 2025 updated network meta-analysis
    02
    [1, 2]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    Let's start with the size of the prize. The 2025 network meta-analysis in JACC pooled 89 randomised trials and more than one hundred thousand patients. Quadruple therapy with an ARNI, a beta-blocker, an MRA and an SGLT2 inhibitor reduced all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of about 0.39 versus placebo. Adding vericiguat moved it slightly further, to 0.35. In absolute terms, a typical 70-year-old gains over five life-years. A separate meta-analysis shows the same combination produces the largest reverse remodelling, with LVEF gains around 15 points. Practical point: when you tell a patient this is worth five extra years, adherence conversations become much easier.

  3. Slide 3 · The four pillars: starting and target doses

    The four pillars: starting and target doses
    Pillar
    Agent
    Starting dose
    Target dose
    ARNI
    Sacubitril/valsartan
    24/26–49/51 mg twice daily
    97/103 mg twice daily
    Beta-blocker
    Bisoprolol / carvedilol / metoprolol succinate
    1.25 mg od / 3.125 mg bid / 12.5–25 mg od
    10 mg od / 25 mg bid (50 mg bid if >85 kg) / 200 mg od
    MRA
    Spironolactone / eplerenone
    12.5–25 mg od / 25 mg od
    25–50 mg od / 50 mg od
    SGLT2i
    Dapagliflozin / empagliflozin
    10 mg od
    10 mg od (no titration)
    03
    [3, 4, 5]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    Here are the four pillars with trial-proven doses, aligned with the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline and the 2024 ACC decision pathway. ARNI is preferred over ACE inhibitor or ARB in symptomatic patients; if switching from an ACE inhibitor, respect the 36-hour washout. Only the three evidence-based beta-blockers belong here. MRA dosing depends on potassium and renal function. And the SGLT2 inhibitor is the easiest pillar: one dose, no titration, minimal blood pressure effect. Practical tip: the target dose is the trial dose, not a suggestion. Document the current percentage of target for each class at every visit, so the gap stays visible.

  4. Slide 4 · Start all four pillars early, not sequentially

    Start all four pillars early, not sequentially
    Legacy sequential approach
    ACEi first, then BB, then MRA, each to target before adding next
    Full regimen takes many months to assemble
    Many patients never receive all classes
    Early events occur while therapy is incomplete
    Contemporary parallel approach
    Initiate all four classes at low doses within weeks
    SGLT2i and MRA add little blood pressure burden
    Presence of every class outweighs maximising one
    Begin in hospital once haemodynamically stable
    04
    [3, 5]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    The old teaching was to introduce drugs one by one, pushing each to target before adding the next. That historical order reflects when trials were published, not biology. The benefits of each class appear within weeks, so delaying a class means losing benefit. The 2024 ACC decision pathway endorses rapid, flexible sequencing: get all four classes on board at low doses, then titrate. A useful order in a borderline-pressure patient is SGLT2 inhibitor and MRA first, since they barely lower blood pressure, then beta-blocker and ARNI. Hospital admission is the ideal moment: the patient is monitored and motivated.

  5. Slide 5 · Rapid titration: lessons from STRONG-HF

    Rapid titration: lessons from STRONG-HF
    How fast is safe after an acute admission?
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    So we know what to give. The next question is how fast. For years we lacked randomised data on the pace of titration, and many of us were cautious, especially in older or frail patients. STRONG-HF changed that. It tested an intensive strategy right after an acute heart failure admission, the highest-risk window, and measured both efficacy and safety. Let's look at what it showed and how it translates to your clinic.

  6. Slide 6 · STRONG-HF: full doses within two weeks

    STRONG-HF: full doses within two weeks
    1,078 patients randomised before discharge after acute HF, 87 centres
    High-intensity care: 100% target doses within 2 weeks of discharge
    Four visits over 2 months guided by clinical status, labs, NT-proBNP
    180-day death or HF readmission: 15.2% vs 23.3% with usual care
    Benefit consistent across age, sex, baseline eGFR and LVEF; better quality of life
    06
    [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    STRONG-HF randomised over a thousand patients just before discharge. The high-intensity arm aimed for full doses within two weeks, with visits checking congestion, blood pressure, heart rate, potassium, creatinine and NT-proBNP. The primary endpoint of death or heart failure readmission at 180 days fell from about 23 to 15 percent. Subanalyses are reassuring: no meaningful interaction with age over 65, sex, baseline kidney function, or ejection fraction above or below 40 percent, and quality of life improved more with intensive care. Adverse events were somewhat more frequent but serious events were not. Take-home: the elderly patient is not a reason to go slow by default.

  7. Slide 7 · Rapid up-titration applies to all patients

    Rapid up-titration applies to all patients
    A rapid up-titration of GDMT immediately after an AHF hospitalization can and should be implemented similarly in men and women
    STRONG-HF sex-specific analysis, Eur J Heart Fail 2023
    07
    [7, 8]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    This sentence from the STRONG-HF sex-specific analysis captures the message well. Women are historically undertreated and underdosed in heart failure, often because of concerns about lower body weight or blood pressure. In STRONG-HF, women and men had similar benefit and similar safety. The same was true for older patients. So the default should be to titrate everyone, and to individualise only when there is a specific clinical reason. Let's now look at those reasons, the common barriers that stall titration, and how to handle them without abandoning therapy.

  8. Slide 8 · Managing common titration barriers

    Managing common titration barriers
    Issue
    Interpretation
    Action
    Low BP, asymptomatic
    Usually tolerated; not a reason to stop
    Continue GDMT; recheck at next visit
    Symptomatic hypotension
    More frequent with ARNI-based regimens
    Reduce diuretic if euvolaemic; stop non-HF antihypertensives; stagger dosing
    Early eGFR decline
    Often haemodynamic; may signal congestion
    Do not stop GDMT reflexively; reassess volume; recheck labs
    Hyperkalaemia
    Mainly MRA and ARNI related
    K+ >5.5 mmol/L: reduce or hold MRA; consider potassium binder
    Bradycardia
    HR <50 bpm or symptomatic
    Reduce beta-blocker; review other rate-slowing drugs
    08
    [9, 12, 13, 14]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    These are the barriers that most often stop titration. Asymptomatic low blood pressure is not a contraindication; many patients run systolic pressures in the nineties without problems. If symptomatic, cut the diuretic in a euvolaemic patient and stop non-heart-failure antihypertensives before touching GDMT. The KDIGO conference emphasised that small eGFR declines after starting these drugs are usually haemodynamic and do not require discontinuation. In STRONG-HF, an early eGFR drop was linked to residual congestion and subsequently lower GDMT doses, so think decongestion, not withdrawal. Note also that SGLT2 inhibitors protect against renal adverse events and help limit hyperkalaemia.

  9. Slide 9 · Structured follow-up and timely specialist referral

    Structured follow-up and timely specialist referral
    Every titration visit (1–2 weekly)
    Congestion, weight, BP including orthostatic, heart rate
    Potassium, creatinine/eGFR, NT-proBNP trend
    One dose step per visit; adjust loop diuretic
    Adherence, education, record % of target dose
    Refer to HF specialist when
    Persistent NYHA III–IV or recurrent HF admissions
    Intolerance prevents reaching meaningful GDMT doses
    LVEF ≤35% after ≥3 months optimised GDMT: ICD/CRT evaluation
    Advanced HF markers: worsening renal function, hypotension, cachexia
    09
    [3, 5, 6]
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    How do we make this work in practice? Borrow the STRONG-HF structure: early visits after discharge, roughly weekly or fortnightly, each with a short checklist. Assess congestion, vital signs, potassium, creatinine and natriuretic peptide, then make one change. Nurse-led or telephone visits can cover many steps. Refer early when titration stalls because of intolerance, when symptoms persist, or after repeated admissions. And remember device timing: reassess LVEF after about three months of optimised therapy, since many patients improve enough to avoid an ICD. Practical tip: a pre-printed titration plan given at discharge saves weeks.

  10. Slide 10 · References

    References
    1. 1.van Essen BJ, Ceelen DCH, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Pharmacologic Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.054
    2. 2.Tang J, Wang P, Liu C, et al. Pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000003118
    3. 3.Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
    4. 4.Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
    5. 5.Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024
    6. 6.Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1
    7. 7.Arrigo M, Biegus J, Asakage A, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure in elderly patients: A sub-analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2920
    8. 8.Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Lam CSP, Sliwa K, et al. Sex-specific analysis of the rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after a hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2882
    9. 9.Ter Maaten JM, Mebazaa A, Davison B, et al. Early changes in renal function during rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy following an admission for acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3074
    10. 10.Čelutkienė J, Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Cotter G, et al. Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2024. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221
    11. 11.Arrigo M, Davison B, Edwards C, et al. Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of early vs. late enrollees of the STRONG-HF trial. Am Heart J. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.019
    12. 12.Lam CSP, Bozkurt B, Cherney DZI, et al. Kidney Disease and Heart Failure: Recent Advances and Current Challenges: Conclusions From a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. JACC Heart Fail. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.102943
    13. 13.Jiang N, Zhang Y, Tang Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of different SGLT2 inhibitor-based combination strategies in HFrEF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1742128
    14. 14.Writing Committee, Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022
    10
    Made with Doctoria
  11. Slide 11 · Questions?

    Questions?
    Start all four pillars early, reach target doses within weeks, follow closely
    Made with Doctoria

    Speaker notes

    To summarise: quadruple therapy offers the largest survival benefit we have in HFrEF, measured in years of life. Start all four classes early and in parallel, ideally before discharge. Titrate rapidly, as STRONG-HF showed, across ages and sexes, with structured visits checking congestion, vitals and labs. Manage hypotension, kidney function changes and potassium thoughtfully rather than stopping drugs. And refer when titration stalls or advanced features appear. I'm happy to take questions or discuss difficult cases from your practice.

References

  1. van Essen BJ, Ceelen DCH, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Pharmacologic Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.054
  2. Tang J, Wang P, Liu C, et al. Pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000003118
  3. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
  4. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
  5. Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024
  6. Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1
  7. Arrigo M, Biegus J, Asakage A, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure in elderly patients: A sub-analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2920
  8. Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Lam CSP, Sliwa K, et al. Sex-specific analysis of the rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after a hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2882
  9. Ter Maaten JM, Mebazaa A, Davison B, et al. Early changes in renal function during rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy following an admission for acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3074
  10. Čelutkienė J, Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Cotter G, et al. Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2024. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221
  11. Arrigo M, Davison B, Edwards C, et al. Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of early vs. late enrollees of the STRONG-HF trial. Am Heart J. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.019
  12. Lam CSP, Bozkurt B, Cherney DZI, et al. Kidney Disease and Heart Failure: Recent Advances and Current Challenges: Conclusions From a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. JACC Heart Fail. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.102943
  13. Jiang N, Zhang Y, Tang Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of different SGLT2 inhibitor-based combination strategies in HFrEF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1742128
  14. Writing Committee, Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022

This presentation was generated automatically to show what Doctoria can do and has not been reviewed as clinical guidance. Clinical cases in the examples are fictional.

More examples